US Supreme Court docket revives ‘Stay in Mexico’ immigration coverage

  • The US Supreme Court docket blocked the Biden administration’s try to dismantle the “Stay in Mexico” coverage.
  • The three progressive judges indicated they’d have allowed the coverage to be blocked.
  • Immigration rights teams protested the order.

The US Supreme Court docket on Tuesday allowed the revival of an immigration coverage that compelled asylum seekers to attend in Mexico for his or her courtroom dates, in a blow to US President Joe Biden.

Underneath former president Donald Trump’s “Stay in Mexico” programme, tens of 1000’s of non-Mexican asylum seekers – principally from Central America – had been despatched again over the border pending the result of their purposes.

READ | Going through inflow of migrants, Biden says he makes ‘no apologies’ for border coverage adjustments

The Biden administration moved rapidly to begin dismantling and finish the controversial coverage, formally known as the Migrant Safety Protocols (MPP).

That transfer made its method by way of the US courtroom system, prompting the administration to ultimately ask the Supreme Court docket for a keep in reinstating the programme.

In a short unsigned order, nonetheless, the courtroom mentioned Tuesday that “the applying for a keep… is denied.”

In response to the doc, the courtroom’s three progressive judges – Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan – mentioned they’d have permitted suspension.


Within the order, the courtroom referenced a separate case through which it blocked Republicans in June 2020 from ending a federal programme giving authorized standing to a whole bunch of 1000’s of immigrants, referred to as Dreamers.

The courtroom had discovered the Republican transfer to cancel this system to be “arbitrary and capricious”.

The Supreme Court docket equally mentioned in its order on Tuesday that the Biden administration had “failed to indicate a probability of success on the declare that the memorandum rescinding the Migrant Safety Protocols was not arbitrary and capricious”.

The case can now proceed at a decrease degree in an appeals courtroom.

The Division of Homeland Safety mentioned in an announcement that it “regrets that the Supreme Court docket declined to concern a keep”.

It added that “because the enchantment course of continues, nonetheless, DHS will adjust to the order in good religion”.

Immigrant rights teams additionally protested the Supreme Court docket (SCOTUS) order.

“At this time’s SCOTUS resolution forcing the reinstatement of the ‘Stay in Mexico’ coverage is nothing in need of merciless,” mentioned Yael Schacher, senior US advocate at Refugees Worldwide.

The “Biden administration should not see this resolution as a mandate.”

By no means miss a narrative. Select from our vary of newsletters to get the information you need delivered straight to your inbox.

Supply hyperlink

Comment here