News

Hong Kong Convicts Martin Lee and Different Democracy Leaders Over Protest


HONG KONG — Seven of Hong Kong’s main veteran pro-democracy advocates have been discovered responsible on Thursday of unauthorized meeting, as Beijing’s marketing campaign to quash the town’s opposition ensnared a few of its most senior and well-recognized figures.

Martin Lee, an 82-year-old barrister often called the “father of democracy” in Hong Kong, Jimmy Lai, 73, a media tycoon and founding father of the staunchly pro-democracy Apple Each day newspaper, and Margaret Ng, 73, a revered barrister and columnist, together with 4 others, have been convicted of collaborating and organizing an unauthorized march in 2019.

Earlier than the listening to, among the defendants rallied outdoors the court docket, holding a banner that learn, “Oppose Political Persecution; Protest Political Suppression.” Contained in the courtroom, supporters seated within the gallery cheered them on, shouting: “Sustain your spirits!”

The prosecution of veteran pro-democracy figures in Hong Kong has been held up by their supporters as a extreme assault on the liberty of speech and different civil liberties that after have been core to the town’s identification.

Hong Kong’s authorities have overseen an expansive crackdown on the pro-democracy motion because the metropolis was engulfed by antigovernment protests in 2019. Greater than 2,400 folks have been charged because the authorities sought to quash the motion that had posed the best problem to Beijing’s rule in a long time.

Beijing has sought to depict a number of of the opposition figures as subversive components working with hostile international forces to undermine Chinese language sovereignty. Critics of this view say the ruling Communist Celebration is barely deflecting the true democratic aspirations of the Hong Kong folks.

Mr. Lee, Mr. Lai and Albert Ho have been denounced in Chinese language state media as being a part of a “Gang of 4” who stirred unrest in 2019, an accusation at odds with the largely leaderless motion within the streets.

Human rights advocates have been sharply crucial of the convictions, labeling them as a part of an effort to undermine the long-running marketing campaign for democracy in Hong Kong.

“This trial was additionally concerning the lengthy historical past, legacy and contributions of the elder statesmen and ladies of the motion,” mentioned Samuel Chu, the managing director of the Washington-based Hong Kong Democracy Council. “It’s about discrediting their lifetime contributions to Hong Kong, to the motion, to staff, to grass-roots, to people and their professions.”

The case centered on a rally on August 18, 2019 when a whole lot of hundreds of individuals gathered in an antigovernment protest.

That gathering had acquired police approval. However what adopted didn’t. The defendants have been accused of main protesters out of Victoria Park on Hong Kong Island, starting a march that led towards the core enterprise district. Whereas there was no violence and minimal dysfunction, prosecutors argued that the march violated Hong Kong’s public order ordinance.

Their attorneys argued that main protesters out of the park, which had full of many extra folks than it may deal with, was essential for public security. In addition they mentioned that imprisoning them over a peaceable march was a heavy-handed software of the regulation.

“In fact we’re very disillusioned with the decision as a result of what now we have performed is barely exercising our constitutional proper,” one defendant, the labor chief Lee Cheuk-yan, mentioned after the listening to. “Nevertheless it’s a badge of honor for us that we’re convicted for strolling along with the folks of Hong Kong for democracy and freedom.”

The protests that summer time have been targeted at first on a proposal to permit extraditions to mainland China however expanded to incorporate calls for for direct elections and an investigation into using power by police.

The prosecution of the town’s pro-democracy leaders over a peaceable protest has drawn a world outcry. David Perry, a outstanding British barrister who was employed to guide the prosecution, dropped the case after coming below sharp criticism at dwelling. Dominic Raab, the British international secretary, had mentioned Mr. Perry was “fairly mercenary” and was giving the Chinese language authorities a public relations win.

The State Division, in an annual report on Hong Kong issued Wednesday, mentioned that the Hong Kong authorities “didn’t respect” the suitable to free meeting supplied below native regulation, and that by imposing a nationwide safety regulation final 12 months, China had “dramatically undermined rights and freedoms in Hong Kong.”

The trial took 20 days, twice so long as had been scheduled. The defendants, who additionally embrace the previous lawmakers Cyd Ho and Leung Kwok-hung, withstand 5 years in jail. Sentences shall be handed down on April 16.

One other former lawmaker, Au Nok-hin, 33, had beforehand pleaded responsible to each fees, whereas Leung Yiu-chung, 67, had pleaded responsible to a single cost of collaborating within the protest.

The decision may set expectations for a number of trials on comparable fees of unlawful protests set to happen this 12 months.

As well as, 47 pro-democracy politicians and activists have been charged with subversion below the brand new safety regulation for collaborating in an election main that prosecutors say was a part of a plan to subvert the federal government.

Mr. Lai, the media tycoon, has been charged in a separate nationwide safety case for allegedly lobbying for American sanctions towards Hong Kong and Chinese language officers.



Supply hyperlink

Comment here