Scott Kronland, a lawyer for the drivers, praised Roesch’s choice. “Our place is that he’s precisely proper and that his ruling goes to be upheld on enchantment,” Kronland mentioned.
However the gig economic system firms argued that the choose had erred by “ignoring a century’s value of case legislation requiring the courts to protect the voters’ proper of initiative,” mentioned Geoff Vetter, a spokesperson for the Defend App-Based mostly Drivers & Providers Coalition, a bunch that represents gig platforms.
The choice isn’t more likely to instantly have an effect on the brand new legislation and is definite to face appeals from Uber and different so-called gig economic system firms.
An Uber spokesperson mentioned the ruling ignored nearly all of California voters who supported the legislation. “We’ll enchantment, and we count on to win,” the spokesperson, Noah Edwardsen, mentioned. “In the meantime, Prop 22 stays in impact, together with all the protections and advantages it supplies impartial employees throughout the state.”
Uber and different gig economic system firms are pursuing comparable laws in Massachusetts. This month, a coalition of firms filed a poll proposal that would enable voters within the state to resolve subsequent yr whether or not gig employees must be thought-about impartial contractors.